The characteristics that pulled the Greek city states together where the poetry of Homer and the food growth and preparation.
The first, the poetry of Homer, is what defined the culture aspect of the Greek societies, as it was the most important poet at the time. Homer' poetry where taught in all the greek polis (the greek name for city-states) and it was the base of school at the time, for those who had the priviledge to learn how to write and read. Other people were instructed in the poetry by listen to people who had to memorizied the poem.
The second, the food growth and preparation, comes from the natural resources of Greece. The type of soil and the morphology of the territory allowed for very specific culture, that become the base of food in the country.
---
The characteristics that pulled the Greek city states apart where the culture within the city-state, the loyalty to the polis and different languages. As for the first, every polis had its own culture. For example, Athens were focused on democracy and culture, while Sparta was all about war and competition. The loyalty to the polis was fundamental in the education, as it was the first and most important institution which greek people at the time should be loyal to. Besides from these facts, different languages did not help different polis come together, as the linguistic barrier could be a serious difficulty to overcome at the time as today.
----
Oligarchy is a form of government in which a small group (oligo-) holds all the power(archy). Many polis were hold by an oligarchy. It was the most common form of government at the time. how the oligarchy was selcted was different from polis to polis. For example, Athens used to held election - altough those were reserved to the male, medium and high classes people.
The correct answer is b.universal because the actual definition for universal is- affecting, or done by all people or things in the world or in a particular group; applicable to all cases. Hope this helps! :)
Trade played a more central role in the mercantilist period of European history from 1500 to 1750 – sometimes referred to as early capitalism or trade capitalism – than in almost any other period.1<span> We must begin with the questions: When in human history did the first exchange of goods between </span>Europe<span> and the other four continents of </span>Africa<span>, </span>Asia<span>, </span>America<span> and </span>Australia<span>occur? Where are the origins of what one could describe as on-going exchange, as established economic relations to be found? These questions refer to an even larger global context because the global economic edifice changed fundamentally from "proto-globalization" to </span><span>globalization </span>.2<span> This process was primarily determined by Europe from the 15th to the 20th century. From the 16th century to 1914, trade within Europe at all times constituted the most significant portion of global trade, and the volume of that trade grew disproportionately quickly during the early modern period and into the modern period.</span>3<span> National markets became increasingly interconnected, driven by numerous innovations in the areas of infrastructure, </span>transportation<span>, energy supply, and – not least – institutions (rules, constitutions, division of labour, currency standards, etc.). The transition from individual production to </span><span>mass production </span><span> and the convergence of prices of goods and materials made transactions considerab</span>
to protect white settlers
HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD
