Answer: C. Less potential for abuse of power
Explanation:
With a Federal government, power is divided between the Federal government and the state government. Even though the Federal government has power over the state government, there are certain powers that belongs to the state government alone that the Federal government cannot infringe upon unless the state government acts against the Constitution of the nation.
This division of powers reduces the potential for abuse of power because neither government has the absolute power necessary to act in an abusive way to its citizens.
Answer:
The treaty helped create economic ties between the U.S. and Great Britain.
Explanation:
The 1794 peace treaty signed by Great Britain and the U.S. as a result of the need to prevent a possible war between the nations. Moreover, it was also needed to negotiate a peaceful solution to solve the problem between the two nations without the need to resort to any fighting.
The result of this effort was Jay's Treaty signed in London by John Jay and Lord Grenville. It settled the outstanding conflict between the nations and also provided a more peaceful method of creating economic ties between them. But at the same time, it only triggered the relationship between America and France, who took it as a violation of their peace treaty, the Franco-American mutual defense treaty of 1778.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Bombing of war supporting industries and transportation system immobilizes the enemies and wars can be won through this approach. This is supported by the comprehensive doctrine of air warfare.
Based on the thoughts of Keven, we can infer that this is a<u> hasty generalization fallacy. </u>
<h3>What is a hasty generalization fallacy?</h3>
- Coming to a conclusion about a population based on observations from a very small sample size.
- It is usually false and overblown.
Kevin came to his decision based on the small sample size of his grandparents alone. They are simply too small to account for the millions of older people out there.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on hasty generalization at brainly.com/question/1580820.
Answer:C)valid
Explanation:
A valid argument is an argument whose conclusions can be traced or related to the premise of such an argument.
Any argument whose conclusions can be linked up with the initial assumptions made by the premise if invalid.
The action of the college administrator of trying to assess whether an admissions test accurately predicts how well applicants will perform at his school the College administrator is concerned whether there is a valid Relationship.
