Answer:
In that particular case Dale would have none of these defenses because:
- <u>He cannot allege duress</u> because his life was not threatened in any situation, he has a safe way to escape and avoid the crime.
- <u>He cannot allege mistake</u> because even when Phil (undercover agent assigned) was thinking that he (Dale) was breaking the FCPA laws, the crime was not commited yet. Dale effectively commited a violation knowing the laws and consequences.
- He cannot allege entrapment because he was not pushed or encouraged by Phil (FBI undercover agent) to do the crime, Dale commited the violation without the influence of any law officer.
The correct option will be option "D".
The answer is; because it both authorises spending and appropriate funds.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
Is there more to this question if not I can figure it out
He debated with Stephen Douglass, in what would eventually be called the "Lincoln-Douglass Debates"
This is an example of the apotheosis of popular leader.
Explanation:
The apotheosis of the Kim family in the dictatorship of north Korea is a symptomatic example of a autocracy which is completely run in the power of one person and the one person only who can decide all courses of action for the country by his own.
This person and his family that inherits the title from him is wont to be worshiped for him to be able to govern the kind of respect to consolidate his power in Korea as he does.