Answer:
b. Calling someone professionally incompetent.
Explanation:
Defamation is a situation that happens when an individual makes untrue statements about another person in a way that damages their reputation before society. Defamation per se, in turn, is an act of defamation so cruel that the victim needs no proof to prove that his reputation has been damaged, in which case the defamatory act is so serious that it is not necessary to judge its results. to declare someone guilty. Among the options given in the question above, the only one that cannot be used as an example of defamation per se is "Calling someone professionally incompetent".
Answer:
by not smoking, duh, it is bad for health and eat healthy food, vegetables
Explanation:
The 3 ways that people are ushered into a permanent 2nd-class status via the criminal justice system:
- the police
- the courts
- corrections
The grownup criminal justice gadget is comprised of 4 components; law, law enforcement, courts, and corrections. Every one of these 4 additives is produced from subcomponents.
These days jail reform ideas encompass more access to felony suggest and family, conjugal visits, proactive security towards violence, and imposing residence arrest with assistive generation.
Learn more about criminal justice here brainly.com/question/5111667
#SPJ4
Yes, The evidence discovered upon first entering the house may be utilized in court to prove his guilt.
<h3>Which or which kind of evidence are not allowed in court?</h3>
Anything that violates the law or the rules of the court is not admissible evidence. For instance, hearsay evidence or evidence collected illegally is not admissible. Additionally, it might not be accepted if information is not directly related to the dispute. Evidence that is detrimental may also render it inadmissible in court.
<h3>What two conditions must be met before a piece of evidence can be used in court?</h3>
Criminal cases (a) (1) The defendant may demonstrate that the moral quality at issue in the alleged conduct is consistent with his or her decent moral character. (2) The prosecution may not establish the defendant's bad moral character as it relates to the moral characteristic at issue in the alleged offense, unless in rebuttal.
To know more about admissible evidence, visit:
brainly.com/question/29550883
#SPJ4
Answer:
The high court involves justices discussing a case debating and arriving at their opinions on the appropriate ruling.
