1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
3 years ago
6

What was a problem after the french and indian war?

History
1 answer:
Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago
8 0
Britain was still at war with France, and it needed funds. So King George raised taxes on the colonies and justified them by saying that the colonies needed to pay Britain back for defending the colonists. This is, of course, paraphrasing. Obviously, the colonists did not take well to the tax hikes, as demonstrated by the Boston Tea Party. 
You might be interested in
Jesus was the fulfillment of the covenant God made with
Ganezh [65]
He made the covenant with Abraham
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
despite a successful election in 2011 which country has problems of government corruption, a lack of Social Service and widespre
Zielflug [23.3K]
Would u think China or Korea ?
4 0
3 years ago
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
fredd [130]

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful. 

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's. 

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

6 0
3 years ago
I need help ASAP Number 2 represents the country of
tino4ka555 [31]
North korea!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ME PLEASE!!!!!
Brilliant_brown [7]
A - Bush told the American people that there was evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
C - As soon as US forces ousted Saddam Hussein, a civil war in Iraq began, which Bush didn't plan
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the buffalo in danger of being eradicated in the west
    9·1 answer
  • •When was the tipping point at which the United States could no longer be considered an isolated nation?
    15·1 answer
  • Sea-faring people renowned for their glassware
    6·1 answer
  • What was the major religion of the four Persian empire
    7·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP PLEASE!!!<br><br> 1. Which shows the Aztec empire ? <br> -a<br> -b<br> -c<br> -d
    13·2 answers
  • ? Which phrase describes what the "push and pull" theory was about?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Mental health​
    11·2 answers
  • 1. Where did the dustbowl happen?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the Jewish Diaspora?
    10·2 answers
  • Hamilton attended king’s college, which is now known as what?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!