Answer: WHAT WAS THE SAME 1) reigning dynasty was Bourbon dynasty, 2) there was no democracy and democratic participation on political order (no elections), 3) society continued being not secularized (unity of trone and altar), 4) no free press (freedom of expression). "Declaration de l´homme et du citoyen" (preamble of all French constitutions) was not put in reality. WHAT WAS DIFFERENT: 1) power of dynasty was increasingly dependent on foreign countries, dynasty had weak support from the population, dynasty was put back on the basis of Vienna Congress (1814-1815), 2) French kings had to make concessions (limited monarchy), 3) there were three currents on the right-wing political spectre: - legistimistes (supporting absolute monarchy and Bourbon dynasty), - orleanistes (supporting constitutional monarchy of the house of Orleans), - napoleonistes (supporting house of Napoleon), - there was much less credibility of Bourbon dynasty.
Explanation:
Answer: They were not every succesful
Explanation:
A). <u>Universal rights</u>,
B). <u>Laws of nature</u>,
C). <u>A constitutional monarch</u><u>.</u>
<h3>What did " The Sweets of Liberty" made of?</h3>
The "Sweets of Liberty" is a part of the 'British School II' album, which consists approximately 170 prints and was published between 1713 and 1810.
In the book, the author described the origins of the Royal Academy and role played by Academicians in the development of British art.
The whole album is organized with the events in chronological order.
Learn more about the Universal rights here:-
brainly.com/question/13253985
#SPJ1
Answer:
Sharia law is Islam's legal system. It is derived from both the Koran, Islam's central text, and fatwas - the rulings of Islamic scholars. Sharia literally means "the clear, well-trodden path to water".
Explanation:
Answer:
A: Slaves
Explanation:
Slaves were first of all, already poor and not paid at all. So this answer is most likely.
