Which of the following is true of evidence and experience? An experience can be evidence if other evidence does not contradict i
t. Experience is always credible evidence for a claim regardless of what other evidence is available. Experience can never be evidence for a claim. Experience only matters in horseshoes.
An experience can be evidence if other evidence does not contradict it.
Explanation:
A few different ways individuals oppose contrary evidenceor proof are by denying proof, overlooking it, or reworking it so it fits better with their partialities. Basic scholars can neutralize affirmation inclination by considering data that may repudiate what they have confidence in alongside the data that bolsters what they put stock in.
Evidence is always credible evidence for a claim regardless of what other evidence is available
Explanation:
An experience is an unforgotten knowledge that can be applicable to a scenario so far it meets the criteria of the previous scenario. It will become evident if the application of the experience is credible and worth applying, for example you tried entering a mini bus and you are a tall person, the first time you tried to enter the mini bus you hit your head against the door of the mini bus. The next time you want to enter the bus, you tried to avoid the same thing that happened to you the other time, this approach is an experienced approach, so it is evident because it can be seen that you are trying to avoid the same scenario that happened to you the other time.
One of the example would be: <span>Asking women if they have had an abortion Women who had abortion usually experienced a drastic emotional pressure right before and after the abortion process. Finding out the harm of abortion by collecting the data from women who never actually experienced wouldn't represent the closest situation compared to the women who actually experienced it.</span>
