The type of <span>entity that they created if they have no personal liability for the firm's debts would be: Corporation
In case of bankruptcy, a corporation must sell all of its assets to pay up the debt. But after all assets are liquidated, the debtor couldn't seek the payment further to the corporation's owner and have to accept the residual debt as a loss.</span>
Answer:
d) negative cash flow appearing in red font.
Explanation:
Colour coding is a type of excel formatting for financial modelling.
Color coding allows anyone to immediately pick up your model and know what can be changed (assumptions) and what should not be altered (formulas).
Example:
negative cash flow (Cash outflow) of the company appears in red font while positive cash flow (Cash inflow) of the company appears in green font.
A company that exists on different locations around the world I think.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
