Answer:
D. He has a long term liability.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
c. $12,175,000.
Explanation:
Given: Merchandise sold by Lang company= $12520000.
Sales return and allowances= $270000.
Discount= $140000.
While calculating net sales, freight out charges is not included as it an selling expense and it should be included while calculating Gross profit of the company.
Here, we have to find the last year net sales for Lang company.
∴ 
⇒ Net sales = 
∴Net sales= 
Answer:
B) The promise to pay in the event of a covered claim
Explanation:
The promise to pay in the happening of a covered claim apparently describes the promise to pay in the process of covered claim. In insurance matter of contracts, the insurer assures to pay for covered losses which the insured suffers and the insured promises to do what the contract says and pay the premium. Most non insurance contracts are fluctuating contracts. The amount of attention given by both parties are almost equivalent.
