Answer:
a. allowing employees in an organization to create policies for self-governance documents to comply with legal or regulatory requirements at the employees' discretion
Explanation:
Of the options provided, a. is the one that sticks out as non-compliant. Compliance has to do with the establishment of rules and regulations by an organisation or a government on how to operate.
Allowing employees to create self-governance documents to comply with legal or regulatory requirements at their own discretion would lead to a system of non-uniformity and people would act as they please. That would not be recommended in a system that wants to demonstrate compliance.
If the President should sign such a law in place the effect would be:
- A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.
- B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.
- E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.
<h3>What would be the effect of the Presidents policy on the economy?</h3>
By asking that the consumption of apples be increased, it would lead to a rise in the demand for apples in the country.
When this happens, it means that the revenue of apple growers would rise in the country due to increased demand.
Complete question:
Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs: All Americans are required to eat one apple daily.
Which of the following statements correctly describes the effect of this apple-a-day law? Check all that apply.
A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.
B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.
C. The demand for apples remains unchanged.
D. The demand for apple pickers remains unchanged.
E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.
F. The wage of apple pickers increases
Read more on demand here: brainly.com/question/1245771
Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding
