Answer:
Everything in law enforcement is a risk. From the moment you mark on duty until after you mark off city every single action you take is a liability.
The way we manage that (which amounts to tens of millions of incidents and interactions per year) is we try to hire the best officers that are available to us. We have exhaustive hiring processes and extensive training. All of these calls and incidents are highly dynamic and can go from mundane to life threatening in an instant. One single call can save or take a life. That’s why we have a very high level of autonomy. This is not a career field that lends itself to a lot of direct management especially micromanagement. It’s far too complex and far too dynamic to try.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
That we don’t need any of them in this White House
Answer:
In the shooting scene, you'd be able to collect the shell of the bullet and that would be one step to find out what type of gun the perpetrator used. You could go through nearby stores and look through their CCTV camera and find out what kind of car it was and maybe even catch a glimpse of the perpetrators face. However if the shooting was in a residential area you could go door to door looking for witnesses. To see if anybody heard or saw anything.
Answer:
1. it gave us the right to speak freely about our government
2.the right to protest gave us the freedom to directly challenge a law or idea that the people didn't like
3. the right of religion was a critical, yet unseen part of the first amendment considering most people were of se sort of christian branch
On February 24, 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that students at school retain their First Amendment right to free speech. The story of this landmark case begins four years prior, during the early wave of protests against the Vietnam War.
