Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.
Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide
Answer:
The answer would be the Federal Court.
Explanation:
This is because the Federal Court covers the whole united states, and the State Court only covers a specific state.
I hope this helped!
Answer: Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.
Explanation:
Based on the issues discussed in the question, if Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC), it is highly unlikely that Madison will prevail based on the facts that were presented in this summary.
Madison already made a complaint to Renee who told her that she gave Sally the job because they are friends and she needed a better job after her divorce. There's no issue regarding discrimination in what happened on this case.
Fro her to prevail, she must prove specific violation in this case or demonstrate a pattern of discrimination in the workplace that has resulted in a race favored over another.
Answer:
ust about anyone who sat through ninth grade Civics class can tell you that the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. But what exactly is cruel and unusual in contemporary American society? Public executions have been outlawed since 1936. No one has been executed by hanging or firing squad since 1996 (with the exception of Ronnie Lee Gardner, who was famously executed in 2010–despite a 2004 mandate by the Utah legislature to halt firing squad executions–because of his choice to be “grandfathered” under the old system[1]), and, with a few exceptions, the comparatively humane method of lethal injection is widely used in the thirty-four states in which the death penalty has not been abolished.[2]
Explanation:
Answer:
If the official treaty of the declaration of intemperance isn't multiplied by the diameter of the radius x would be 46 and be subtracted by i.
Explanation:
Lemme break It down to you on foe nem
If the quadrilateral starts in the circumference of the radius the convention source of law wouldn't be able to be multiplied by 6 x 2q unless it is stuck under a bush where I hide my squirrels at.
Other than that you would only get the 42 minus x equals 89 if the declaration independence qualifies as 22986.
Hope this helped
