Answer:
<h3>The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them.</h3>
Explanation:
The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them. This can be seen in the way how Wilson supports privatized agencies that cater to external entities such as politicians. He says that non privatized government agencies “must serve goals not of the organization's own choosing” because catering to citizens can be best catered by private agencies.
Similarly, Edward supports a similar concept like Wilson when he advocates that government should "move activities to the private sector, where they can… be an organic part of society connected to the actual needs of citizens”. Through this statement, he implies that government sector does not effectively provide services to the actual needs of the citizens.
The one contradicting element between these two concepts is that Wilson talks about the transfer of governmental activities to private sector in general and mostly aims on changing the ideas of government agencies, whereas, Edwards reflects his concept in the case of U.S and other countries which have adopted privatization successfully.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It sounds better than the others
a contingency break; inattentional blindness
This scene is an example of a contingency break. A contingency break is when, in a piece of media (usually children movies or TV shows) a scene occurs that is immediately retconned in the next scene. A common example of this is in children's cartoons, when a character may have gotten their clothes dirty in one scene, but they are back to normal in the next with no time for them to have been cleaned. This applies to the movie <em>Shrek</em>, as the three blind mice are turned into horses in one frame, but are back to the status quo in the next.
Inattentional blindness is the failure to notice a fully visible, but unexpected, object/action because one's attention was on another object/action. A contingency break can be considered a "real-life" example of inattentional blindness because, if this scene occurred in real-life, you would not notice the mice turning back to normal as your attention was not focused on them.
