Answer:
Act utilitarianism
Explanation:
Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Act utilitarians believe that whenever we are deciding what to do, we should perform the action that will create the greatest net utility.
Personal jurisdiction is the type of jurisdiction which involves a court's power to bring a person into its adjudicative process.
The power that a court has to make a decision regarding the party being sued in a case is personal jurisdiction.
There are generally five types of jurisdiction: Subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, general and limited jurisdiction, exclusive / concurrent jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction.
The difference between personal and subject jurisdiction is that personal jurisdiction is a requirement that a given court have power over the defendant, based on minimum contacts with the forum while subject jurisdiction is the requirement that a given court have power to hear the specific kind of claim that is brought to that court.
Learn more about personal jurisdiction here:
brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
Answer: Society needed to protect motherhood for the good of the nation.
Explanation:
During the Progressive Era (1890 - 1920) social activism and political reform spread over the United States, developing reforms aimed to face social difficulties related to the industrialization process. Maternalist politics demanded women’s programs focused on problems women faced as wives and mothers, stating women them selves were the best to provide solutions. Furthermore, maternalists stressed the importance of poor women and their children to grow support for the early welfare state.
Answer:
Demographic
Explanation:
Demographic factors refer to the characteristics of a population. These include qualities such as age, gender or ethnicity. When these factors change, different forces might impact an organization and force it to adapt. These are known as demographic forces. When a company or organization refuses to react to these democratic forces, it runs the risk of becoming inefficient or disappearing.