Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
If there is an appreciation in the value of the dollar, it implies that the value of the dollar has increased in comparison to foreign currency. This means that foreign consumers will need to pay more for US goods. This will cause a decline in export demand.
Because of the decline in exports, the net exports will fall. This decrease in the net exports will cause the aggregate demand to fall. As a result, the aggregate demand curve will shift to the left.
Answer:
<em>an option agreement.
</em>
Explanation:
The <em>option agreement</em> in the arena of financial derivatives <em>is a contract between two parties that gives one party the right, but not the obligation, to buy an asset from the other party or to sell an asset to the other</em>.
It outlines the agreed-upon price and the transaction's future date.
Answer:
No it wont have enough money to build a warehouse in two years.
Explanation:
Firstly we are given that the warehouse is $1 million so the company needs to save this amount of money in two years time.
We know that the company has invested $500000 to date therefore we need to calculate if this $50000 per quarter investment will cover the the other portion for $500000 to meet the warehouse cost of $1 million so we will use the future value annuity formula to calculate this which is :
Fv = C[((1+i)^n -1)/i]
where Fv will be the future value after two years of the $50000 investment
C is the periodic payment of $50000
i is the interest rate per period which is 6% per quarter
n is the number of periods the payment is done here it is 4 x 2years= 8 periods / investments of $50000 that will be done.
thereafter we substitute on the above formula:
Fv = 50000[((1+6%)^8 - 1)/6%]
Fv = $494873.40
then we combine this amount to $500000 to see if it reaches $1 million
$494873.40+ $500000 = $994873.40 which is close to the warehouse cost of $1 million but it does not reach it so the company wont have enough money to purchase the warehouse.
Because taxes keep some of the original impact of the tax, unlike spending multipliers, the spending multiplier is always one bigger than the tax multiplier. Any changes in consumer spending that follow any real GDP expansion or contraction brought on by the application of fiscal policy are referred to as the multiplier impact.
Any shift in aggregate demand will typically be significantly increased with a high multiplier, making the economy more unstable. Contrarily, with a low multiplier, changes in aggregate demand will not be amplified by a large amount, leading to a tendency for the economy to be more stable.
To learn more about tax multiplier
brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
