Coincidence is not a form of irony. Sarcasm obviously is, Dramatic is when the reader/viewer knows more than the character in the plot. Situational irony is when the opposite of what's expected happens, and Coincidence is not an irony.
It's not likely you'll overdose on nicotine just from smoking cigarettes. Your body absorbs the nicotine in a cigarette around 1 milligram when you smoke it. Overdosing from nicotine gum or a patch is rare but it's possible if you don't follow the instructions carefully.
I will help you again! So, Sweetie, the answer is Logic. As anyone can bring up motivations.
Hope I helped!
1. The purpose of the line "<span>In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match..." is to imply the main idea of the article. The statement that we can easily kindle fire today implies that there was a time when it wasn't so easy. That is why people had to figure out a way to kindle a fire without looking for a natural source. All of this supports the article's main idea, that match was a brilliant invention, which we shouldn't take for granted.
2. This line shows the need for matches. People had troubles with finding the fire, but it got even harder because any fire can easily get extinguished. This proves there was an urgent need to find a way to kindle fire without having to resort to nature at all times. The line doesn't show how dependable nature is - on the contrary, it shows that humans had to find a way to not depend on it. It doesn't show how people got the fire, or how long it took to make matches.
3. The correct answer is thesaurus. It is not an encyclopedia or an ordinary dictionary, but a dictionary of synonyms, that is words with similar meanings. It also contains antonyms (words with opposite meanings) and words with related meanings. When we don't know what a word means, we use a dictionary or an encyclopedia (or Wikipedia, for that matter). However, when we know its meaning, but are looking for a more appropriate word, we use a thesaurus.</span>
The desire for freedom is the topic shared between the two spirituals.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The two spirituals present freedom as their main theme.
- In "Go Down, Moses" we can see instructions on how Moses was to seek the freedom of the Hebrews when they were enslaved by the Egyptians.
- In "Follow the Drinking Gourd" we can see directions and escape routes, which would give freedom to enslaved people.
It is possible to reach these conclusions from the reading of the two spirituals, where freedom is presented as a topic of great importance and that must be pursued in any circumstance.
More information:
brainly.com/question/19114763?referrer=searchResults
