Probability hit=40%=4/10
probability no hit=1-p (hit)=1-4/10=6/10
probability= p(hit)+p(hit)+p(hit)+p(hit)+p(hit)+p (no hit)+p (no hit)+p (no hit)
probability=4/10×4/10×4/10×4/10×4/10×6/10×6/10×6/10
=0.0022
( I think but I'm not 100% sure)
The answer is yes. all 3 of those triangles have perfect square roots, being 5, 12, and 13 respectively. I hope this helps! Could I possibly get brainliest?
Answer:
Y=2x+0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
The gradient is 2/1=2x
The y-intercept looks to be around 0.5
Answer:
option (b) df = 1, 24
Step-by-step explanation:
Data provided in the question:
levels of factor A, a = 2
levels of factor B, b = 3
Subjects in each Sample, s = 5
n = 5 × 3 × 2 = 30
Now
df for Factor A = a - 1
= 2 - 1
= 1
df for Factor B = b - 1
= 3 - 1
= 2
df for Interaction AB = ( a - 1 ) × ( b - 1 )
= 1 × 2
= 2
df for Total = n - 1
= 30 - 1
= 29
df for error = 29 - 5
= 24
Hence,
df values for the F-ratio evaluating the main effect of factor A is 1, 24
The correct answer is option (b) df = 1, 24
Answer:
Well, It is but not because..rotation symmetry, and a square has -turn (or 90-degree) rotation symmetry. As you may have already observed, many figures have 180-degree rotation symmetry but no other rotation symmetry. A figure has 180-degree rotation symmetry if it looks the same when turned halfway around...Soo yeah..I think I am right, So sorry if I'm wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
