1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sati [7]
2 years ago
11

Heavy​ Products, Inc. developed standard costs for direct material and direct labor. In​ 2017, AII estimated the following stand

ard costs for one of their major​ products, the 10minusgallon plastic container. Budgeted quantity Budgeted price Direct materials 0.9 pounds $ 50 per pound Direct labor 0.2 hours $ 35 per hour During​ June, Heavy Products produced and sold 16 comma 000 containers using 1 comma 900 pounds of direct materials at an average cost per pound of $ 54 and 3 comma 200 direct manufacturing laborminushours at an average wage of $ 51.00 per hour. The direct manufacturing labor efficiency variance during June is​ ________.
Business
1 answer:
Nitella [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Direct labor efficiency variance= 0

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Direct labor 0.2 hours $ 35 per hour. During​ June, Heavy Products produced and sold 16,000 containers using 3,200 direct manufacturing labor-hours at an average wage of $ 51.00 per hour.

Direct labor efficiency variance= (Standard Quantity - Aactual Q)*standard rate

Direct labor efficiency variance= (0.2*16,000 - 3,200)*35= 0

You might be interested in
Prepare income statements based on variable costing for each of the 2 years. 2.Prepare income statements based on absorption cos
enot [183]

Answer:

The question is incomplete, it is missing the accounts and numbers, so I looked for a similar question:

<em>The Rehe Comany sells its razors at $3 per unit. The company uses a first-in, first-out actual costing system. A fixed manufacturing cost rate is computed at the end of each year by dividing the actual fixed manufacturing costs by the actual production units. The following data are related to its first two years of operation: </em>

<em>                    2011 2012 </em>

<em>Sales 1000 units  1200 units </em>

<em>Costs: </em>

<em>Variable manufacturing  700 500</em>

<em>Fixed manufacturing  700 700</em>

<em>Variable operating (marketing) 1000 1200 </em>

<em>Fixed operating (marketing)  400 400</em>

<em />

                                                           2011                  2012

Sales                                               1000 units         1200 units

Production                                          1400                  1000  

Costs:  

Variable manufacturing                      $700               $500

per unit $0.50

Fixed manufacturing                           $700               $700

Variable operating (marketing)         $1000             $1200

Fixed operating (marketing)               $400               $400

cogs under absorption costing 2011 = ($1,400 / 1,400) x 1,000 = $1,000

cogs under absorption costing 2012 = $400 + ($1,200 / 1,000) x 800 = $1,360

1.                                    INCOME STATEMENTS

                                      VARIABLE COSTING

                                                             2011                    2012

Total sales revenue:                        $3,000                $3,600            

Opening inventory:                               ($0)                 ($200)

Variable manufacturing:                   ($700)                 ($500)

<u>Ending inventory:                               $200                   $100 </u>

Gross contribution margin:             $2,500               $3,000

<u>Variable operating:                         ($1,000)              ($1,200)</u>  <u> </u>

Contribution margin:                        $1,500                $1,800  

Fixed manufacturing:                         ($700)                ($700)

<u>Fixed operating:                                ($400)                ($400) </u>

Net operating income:                       $400                  $700

2.                                   INCOME STATEMENTS

                                   ABSORPTION COSTING

                                                             2011                    2012

Total sales revenue:                        $3,000                $3,600            

<u>COGS:                                             ($1,000)                ($1,360) </u>

Gross margin:                                  $2,000                $2,240

<u>Operating costs:                             ($1,400)               ($1,600) </u>

Net operating income:                       $600                   $640

3. Under variable costing, closing inventory = 400 units x $0.50 (variable production costs per unit) = $200.

Under absorption costing, closing inventory = 400 units x $1 (production cost per unit) = $400

Since closing inventory is $200 higher under absorption costing, then net operating income during 2011 increases by $200.

4. a) Variable costing is more likely to result in inventory buildups. Since variable costing determines the value of closing inventory only using variable manufacturing costs, their value is much lower. E.g. in this case the value of closing inventory 2011 under variable costing is $200, while under absorption costing it is $400. This means that less costs are transferred from one year to another.

b) Cost of goods sold must include all production costs (both variable and fixed). This way COGS costs cannot be over estimated during one year and under estimated the next.

<em> </em>

<em />

3 0
3 years ago
3. Working with Numbers and Graphs Q3 Suppose that a small business sells 975 units of goods per month at $30 per unit. The unit
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

economic profit  = $11225

Explanation:

given data

sells = 975 units

cost = $30 per unit

cost of producing goods = $15

implicit costs = $3,400

solution

total revenue = 975 × 30 = $29250

and total cost = 975 × 15  = $14625

so here Total profit will be as

Total profit = $29250 - $14625  = $14625

so here economic profit will be

economic profit  = Total profit  - implicit costs

economic profit  = $14625 -  $3,400

economic profit  = $11225

6 0
3 years ago
Dmitri is training for a triathlon, a timed race that combines swimming, biking, and running. Consider the following sentence: B
kondaur [170]

Answer:

Decision on the margins

Explanation:

Pool time seems to be having a greater effect at the moment, it makes sense for his to spend a bit more time in the pool and a bit less time on the bike.

However, this does not mean that it makes sense for her to spend all his time in the pool and no time on the bike. If he cut out all training on the bike, the value of a little bit of bike training might be higher than the value of the last hour of pool training. Dimitri does not treat biking versus swimming as an all-or-nothing decision. He makes small changes at the margin in the number of hours spent training for each activity.

Also they both realise that his time is fixed (20hrs) and anytime he wants to spend extra on one activit, is time he cannot spend on another (opportunity cost).

They are both trying to improve Dimitri's total time (exploiting opportunities to makes themselves better off).

An assumption that Dimitri realises that as he spends more time in the pool improving his swim time, his run and cycle times will suffer. As he swims more, his improvement is likely to slow down, while spending less time on cycling and running will cost him progressively more in terms of time.

Conclusion Dimitri is looking at the margins. His wife on the other hand, is not, she is ignoring the interaction, may be forgetting the decreasing improvements in swim and increasing deterioration in the other 2 legs.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Green and yellow are adjacent on the color wheel; what does this mean?
matrenka [14]

Answer:

analogous

Explanation:

both green and yellow are a part of analogous

5 0
2 years ago
Two individuals start the same training program at the same time, but one is able to grow muscle faster and larger than the othe
stellarik [79]

Answer:A.One individual was born with more muscle fibers.

Explanation:

Muscle fibers are fibers that helps us break down the protein in our body and protein are the actual muscle makers .

If someone is born with muscle fibers his body breaks up these protein faster that the normal individual which makes their muscles build up faster than a normal person .

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which type of economy provides the least incentive for companies and workers to improve?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true when developing a brand?
    10·2 answers
  • Are used to describe the basic characteristics of study populations and other data sources.
    13·1 answer
  • Describe at least four ways you can take money out of a checking account
    11·2 answers
  • You are planning to purchase the stock of Ted's Sheds Inc. and you expect it to pay a dividend of $3 in 1 year, $4.25 in 2 years
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the three factors of production do you think is most important to economic success? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • Buy working in a series of Positions with increasing responsibilities
    14·1 answer
  • 1. The protocol that a business sticks to on a day-to-day basis is called _____.
    14·2 answers
  • Bundles of cedar shakes produced and sold 360,000 Sales revenue $ 2,412,000 Variable manufacturing expense $ 1,170,000 Fixed man
    15·1 answer
  • When does the company go in loss​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!