Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
1. $3375
$3375
2. $4347
$3456
3 $7300
$5475
Explanation:
Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life
( $29,200 - $2,200,) / 8 = $3375
depreciation expense each year is $3375
Depreciation expense using the double declining method = Depreciation factor x cost of the asset
Depreciation factor = 2 x (1/useful life) = 2/8 = 0.25
2020 = 0.25 x 29200 = 7300
2021 = 0.25x( 29200 - 7300)
Activity method based on output = (output produced that year / total output of the machine) x (Cost of asset - Salvage value)
Answer:
Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE
Explanation:
The SCORE is a non profit organization. Their members are retired executives who are engaged with the provision of free consultation and counseling services and also giving advices to entrepreneurs and small business owners.
This organization has offices in most parts of the united states and their services can be rendered in person or online. Their counseling services are in all areas and the client bears no charges.
Answer: Person-Vocation fit
Explanation: According to the question, Borris lacks Person-Vocation fit as he isn't fully satisfied in his current field of employment as a receptionist, he is aspiring for a better more Noble job profession.
Although Boris has no issue with his current company of employment, he is not satisfied with his job.
Answer:
c. to eliminate unemployment,B. to promote price stability and F. to control federal spending
Explanation:
