Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
<h2>there are two PICTURE </h2>
<h2>i HOPE IT'S HELP </h2>
Answer:
It is a term used to show a crime where there was no victim or complaint to it. Some examples of those types of crimes are prostitution and drug abuse.
Explanation:
The answer was my explanation. Also can you mark me as brainliest pls
Answer:
We know that a federalist is someone who supports a government system in which states are under the "control" of central power. Anti-federalists are the opposite. They oppose a central government, and it's mostly in fear that the government will become too powerful. They believe a strong central government could get in the way of rights and individual freedom.
Explanation:
