Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
That we don’t need any of them in this White House
The answer would be Due Process
A forensic scientist's day-to-day activities will vary throughout the week. The majority of their time is spent in the office writing reports and preparing for laboratory visits. Other days, however, they may be carrying out a laboratory visit or attending court as an expert witness (Brightside, 2003).
