Personal injury protection covers injury caused to any one by our mistake.Property damage on the other hand covers damage caused to someone's property.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Corporal damage security is the protection that covers injuries sustained. While resources harm accident insurance covers the damages caused to other people's property.
Personal injury protection covers injury irrespective of the fact that who made the accident. For example, If a passenger is injured by the driver in an accident then that driver can be held for the medical expenses.
Property destruction responsibility insurance covers damage to someone else's property, it does not cover damages to our own property.It includes property like house,car,office,fences,lamp post ,telephone poles.
Answer:
A) Recruiting at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby
Explanation:
The approach that will yield maximum result if adopted will be for the UCA to carryout their recruitment at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby, by adopting this practice, more Native Americans will be reached for employment opportunities and thus giving them an edge/added chance of being employed, considering that Native Americans are relatively communal. For example, if recruitment is carried out at community events on Native American reservations, the population of Native Americans applying will be higher than any other ethnicity and thus the percentage of qualified Native Americans for the jobs compared to other ethnic groups will still be higher leading to an increase in the numbers employed.
Rating all applicants on a 100 point scale and giving the Native Americans an added 20 point will infringe on fair labour practices and besides Native Americans population are relatively communal.
Option C and D will equally infringe on fair labour practices
Answer:
Original intent, living document
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Answer:
The high court involves justices discussing a case debating and arriving at their opinions on the appropriate ruling.
