Answer:
B) $ 485 $ 170
Explanation
The cost of goods manufactured includes all the manufacturing costs in a given period adjusting for changes in work in process balances. The total manufacturing costs are $ 630 but this results in an increase in work in process inventory by $ 145, so in other words, part of the total manufacturing costs have gone towards increasing the work in process balance.
So the cost of goods manufactured is $ 630 - $ 145 = $ 485.
The cost of goods sold is the cost of goods manufactured above adjusted for changes in finished goods.
so the cost of goods sold is $ 485 - $ 315 ( change in finished goods inventory) = $ 170.
Answer:
The employer wins because he is acting on court orders.
Explanation:
Discrimination in the workplace is a punishable offense by the law. This act of promoting one female for every male promoted is a remedy to being found guilty of discrimination by the court.
In this case where he has been sued again for reverse discrimination, he (employer) is going to win this particular one because he was only acting on court order. The one female for every male was imposed on him by the court. So he is protected from this reverse discrimination accusations by his disgruntled employees.
Answer:
D. standardized marketing
Explanation:
The mass marketing at the center of the undifferentiated approach to target marketing is the assumption that the customer segments across the world will accept the same product regardless of their cultural, behavioral, or socio-economic differences. This is also known as standardized marketing.
Standardized marketing can be definition as the use of global standardization, which refers to when a company uses the same marketing strategy for various countries without minding their difference in culture.
Answer:
(A) she's not consistent in her approach
Explanation:
Charmagne is not consistent in her aproach because she thinks that employees should do what is expected all year long but her evaluations are based on the most recent three month's performance. Her actions impact the overall system because she is only considering the most recent months and not the whole period and that can make a difference because taking just a small sample can make things look different from reality specially when talking about the performance of an employee. For example, a mistake that happened in the last three months can make a good employee look bad and several mistakes someone made in the months that are not considered can make a bad employee look good.
Answer:
<u></u>
Explanation:
The question requires to calculate the annual percentage growth rate assuming it was constant.
The final earnings are equal to the initial earnings multiplied by 1 + the growth rate, raised to the number of periods.
Here:
- initial earnings = $0.50
- final earnings = $5.00
- number of periods = 10 years
Then, your equation is:
- $5.00 = $0.50 (1 + rate)¹⁰
Solving, you get:
Thus, the answer is the option b. 25.89%
