Answer:
207.19 is the cost on sale
Step-by-step explanation:
If there is a discount of 30%, we still have to pay 100-30 = 70%
295.99 * 70%
295.99 * .70
207.193
Rounding to the nearest cent
207.19 is the cost on sale
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Usually, this wording means the decrease is proportional to the current price, characteristic of an exponential function.
__
The decay factor is 1-(decay rate), so is 1-0.15 = 0.85. After 3 years, the value has been multiplied by this factor 3 times:
$50×0.85³ ≈ $30.71 . . . . cost in 3 years
_____
<em>Comment on percent per year</em>
Less often, the indicated decrease is intended to be <em>that percentage of the original price</em>. The result is that the price decreases by a constant amount each year, a linear decrease. This condition most often arises in conjunction with figuring depreciation in value for tax or accounting purposes.
The upshot is that you always need to be careful to understand what the base of a percentage is intended to be.
For the answer to the question above, Since Rachel makes 3 bracelets an hour, her linear equation should be y=3h. 3 represents the rate of change and h represents the number of hours as a variable.
Oliver's linear equation is y=2h+5 because 2 is the rate of change and 5 is the b value or the y-intercept in a linear equation y=mx+b. To find when both have the same number of bracelets, we find the point of intersection...
2h+5=3h
5=3h-2h
5=h
Therefore in 5 hours, both will have the same amount of bracelets.
D.{(-5,4),(2,-3),(1,-6),(0,1)}
