Answer:
In the discussion of Julius Caesar, one controversial issue is how did he die. On the one hand, he is more of a victim than villain. On the other hand, he can be a villain more than a victim. Everyone has a different perspective for if he is a victim or villain. In the following paragraphs, there will be a comparison on Mark Antony’s Funeral Speech and Brutus’s Funeral Speech on whether Julius Caesar is a victim or villain.
First, Julius Caesar demonstrates in his characteristic that shows that he is a dictator. In Brutus’s Funeral Speech it says, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (3.2.23-25). In this quote that Brutus said shows that if Caesar were to have ruled he would not be a great ruler and would of took the people’s rights away. Another characteristic that Brutus shows about Julius Caesar in his quote is, “…as he was valiant, I honour him: but—as he was ambitious, I slew him” (3.2.26-28). In this quote that Brutus said shows that Caesar was ambitious which means that he was eager to rule.
Second, in Mark Antony’s speech, it shows Caesar being more of a victim than a villain. For example, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it" (3.2.79-82). In this quote that Antony said shows that it…show more content…
Brutus believed that Caesar was ambitious, when in reality he was well caring and understanding. In Brutus’s speech he mentions that Caesar is ambitious, “…as he was
Explanation:
The answer is: The <span>British explorer inspects the monolith so carefully with his monocle b</span>ecause he couldn't see very well so it took a long time( He was blind).
The idea that war is an energizing, sentimental undertaking brimming with brilliance and courage has existed for quite a long time and proceeds somewhat today. 100 years back, notwithstanding, Stephen Crane set out to demolish these fantasies through his novel The Red Identification of Boldness, which follows the encounters of a youthful trooper in the American Common War. Crane shows the real essence of battle by differentiating Henry Fleming's sentimental desires with the truth that he experiences.
This differentiation between sentimental vision and cold reality can be seen right off the bat in the novel, with Henry's takeoff from home. Headed to a "delayed rapture of fervor" by the cheering group, Henry enrolls in the military and bids farewell to his mom with a "light of energy and anticipation in his eyes". He foresees a sentimental, nostalgic farewell suggestive of Simple occasions and even goes similarly as getting ready comments ahead of time which he wants to use "with contacting impact" to make "a wonderful scene."
Be that as it may, Crane presents a more practical view. At the updates on Henry's enrollment, his mom essentially says "The Master's will be done" and keeps draining the bovine, having recently asked Henry not to be "a numb-skull" by enrolling. She at that point annihilates his expectations by offering reasonable, useful exhortation in her farewell discourse. Her farewell is so unique in relation to what Henry expects that he is aggravated and "fretful under the trial" of the discourse.