Answer:
Granger movement was the need for unified action against the monopolistic railroads and grain elevators (often owned by the railroads) that charged exorbitant rates for handling and transporting farmers’ crops and other agricultural products. The movement picked up adherents as it became increasingly political after 1870.
"These urban centers require the input of external energy sources in order to overcome the diminishing returns of agricultural consolidation, due partially to the lack of nearby arable land, associated transportation and storage costs, and are otherwise unsustainable. This makes the reliable availability of the needed energy resources a high priority in industrial government policies. Some theoreticians — namely Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens and Manuel Castells—argue that we are located in the middle of a transformation or transition from industrial societies to post-modern societies. The triggering technology for the change from an agricultural to an industrial organization was steam power, allowing mass production and reducing the agricultural work necessary. Thus many industrial cities are built on rivers. Identified as catalyst or trigger for the transition to post-modern or informational society is global information technology."
Answer:
Stop working till their demands were accepted.
Explanation:
The compromise of 1877 ( the great betrayal ) - resulted in the united state’s federal government pulling the last troops out of the south and ending the reconstruction era.
Answer:
In this phrase, Winston Churchill blasted the foreign policy of prime minister Neville Chamberlain (1937-1940) and that of allied France, who chose to conform to Germany´s annexation of the Sudentenland region of Czechoslovakia in 1938 in exchange for peace. Chamberlain wanted to avoid war at any cost. After Adolph Hitler´s aggresive move against a neighbor, Chamberlain flew to Munich and signed an accord with Hitler, the Munich Agreeement, in which the Nazi leader promised no more territorial expansion moves in the future. Hitler broke his promises and annexed more Czech territory. This outcome was called "appeasement" ; Churchill and other critics saw it as ineffective, as a free and shameful concession to an agressor. For the future prime minister and many others, appeasement was a wrong response that only encouraged more Nazi German agression. This interpretation became widely accepted in Western politics and diplomacy after WWII and is often quoted by those who critize aggresive policies by some states.
Explanation:
