1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lynna [10]
3 years ago
15

Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as

Social Studies
2 answers:
inessss [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer

the 'tyranny of the majority"

Explanation

Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political scientist, diplomat and a historian He was best best known for Democracy in America a perceptive analysis of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century. Alexis had a belief that the American jury system was particularly important in educating citizens in self-government and rule of law and expressed how the civil jury system was one of the most effective showcases of democracy because it connected citizens with the true spirit of the justice system. He referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as tyranny of the majority which referred to an   inherent weakness of majority rule in which the majority of an electorate can and does place its own interests above, and at the expense of, those in the minority.

lidiya [134]3 years ago
5 0

Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as  <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>


The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.

You might be interested in
A construction company plans to build a certain number of apartment buildings and stores on a piece of land. This PPC shows the
Natalija [7]
The first question should be <span>b) Shift to the right. Because there is an increase of a parcel of land and in the graph it is increased if shift to right.
The second question should be </span><span>a) shift to the left. Because there is a decrease of a parcel of land due to the obstruction and the graph would shift to left.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Briefly describe the components of attitude. Next, describe factors that can change an individual's attitude.
Harman [31]

Answer:

The three components of an attitude are cognitive, affective, and behavioral. The cognitive component of an attitude is the knowledge or beliefs concerning the attitudinal object. The affective component of an attitude is the emotional stance toward the object. The behavioral aspect of an attitude includes both the behaviors that are inspired by the attitude and the intended behavior inspired by the attitude.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A plaintiff brought an action against a defendant for injuries received in an automobile accident, alleging the defendant's negl
Masteriza [31]

Answer:

A.admissible as habit evidence

Explanation:

A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.

This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.

6 0
3 years ago
Who owns and controls resources when they are nationalized? A. the government B. private businesses C. foreign companies D. inte
Taya2010 [7]

The answer is A- The government.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you had the opportunity to raise taxes rather than cut programs, which policy would you choose
Akimi4 [234]
Either way people would be upset. If you cut programs, those who benefited from them would be mad, whereas an increase in taxes will also upset everyone, because no one really likes taxes.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are rational numbers<br>vvxh​
    7·2 answers
  • What happened when Mexico could not pay its debt?
    7·1 answer
  • The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. How would a historian mo
    15·2 answers
  • This structure is the physical location at which the coordination of information and resources to support incident management (o
    13·1 answer
  • Billy's Bean Bag Emporium produced 300 bean bag chairs but sold only 275 of the units it produced. The average cost of productio
    10·1 answer
  • What are some reasons people would have supported Hamilton
    9·1 answer
  • As opposed to most of the controversies of the early 1960s, most of the protests of the late 1960s were centered around
    7·2 answers
  • Authoritarian governments and theocracies are examples of a
    8·1 answer
  • What type of graph did john use to display his data?
    7·1 answer
  • The ethics codes of most professional organizations provide guidelines for the ethical practice of bartering. some more recent c
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!