I believe the answer would be c it makes the most sense<span />
It is INCORRECT to state that clinical significance means "most likely to be minimal" while statistical significance is "quite large"
<h3>What is Statistical significance?</h3>
In general, statistical significance is attributed to a result when it is determined that an occurrence is unlikely to have happened by chance.
<h3>What is Clinical significance?</h3>
Clinical significance (also known as actual relevance) is ascribed to a result when an event has had real and quantifiable consequences.
In other words, statistical significance aims to refute a negative and establish that an event did not occur by chance; clinical significance seeks to establish a positive and establish that an event did occur in a specific, measurable manner.
Learn more about Statistical Significance:
brainly.com/question/15848236
#SPJ1
Answer:
I personally believe that the political parties nowadays are quite, scrambled. With the President freshly being put into the White House and the sorting out of decisions being made, nobody knows really what to focus on currently. I'm not from the US, nor live there, but I study/research quite a lot about it with current debates and events happening. Continuing, the parties haven't really set a goal/main focus yet, I think when the President sort of sets his mind right on one thing, everybody will just jump on the boat and parties will start going at it with each other. Two thirds of the citizens from the US say the federal government is doing too <u>little</u> when it comes down to making changes and actions with climate change. Washington probably isn't really set and stone with figuring out what to do with climate change, probably kickin' it back and waiting for the pres to do something.
Hope this helped man.
A and C are pretty much the same thing, Either one of those could be true.