The main goal of the creation of the federal budget is to decide how to manage the government’s tax revenue and expenditures. Therefore, the correct answer is c.
The federal budget is made of the spending and revenues of the government. It is a detailed plan towards the annual public revenue and spending of the United States Federal government.
<h2>Further Explanation</h2>
The US federal governments used the federal budget to funds or finance its many expenses such as
- Payment of the salaries of federal employees
- Payment for the equipment of the military
- Dispersing subsidies on agriculture
The fiscal year of the Federal government starts on October 1 and ends on September 30 of the following year.
The revenue for the federal government of the United States comes from tax revenues.
The tax revenues are those on the following:
- Family incomes
- Custom duties
- Tariff
- Business profits
Some of the activities that the government also imposed the use of taxes include
- Cigarette smoking
- Alcohol consumption
- Gasoline
However, there US federal budget contains 2 kinds of spending, which are
- Mandatory spending
- Discretionary spending
Mandatory spending is federal government spending on particular programs that are mandated by law.
These programs include
- Medicare
- Social security
- Medicaid
Mandatory spending is also called as entitlement spending.
Discretionary spending is spending that are approved by the passage of individual appropriation bills.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- budget
- federal
- businesses
- tax
- government
- spending
- revenue
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
A
(sorry if it's wrong, please tell me if it's wrong)
Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
