Answer:
I'm thinking 3
Explanation: It can't be 4, the government has little to no control over free trade. I don't think it's 2 either because I don't think it's international. 3 mostly matches the description of free trade. Hope this helped
Explanation:
Identity Theft.
Mortgage Fraud.
Credit and Debit Card Fraud.
Deceptive Interest Rate Reduction Robocalls.
Fake Charities.
Prize and Lottery Fraud.
Debt Collection Fraud.
CVID-19 Scams.
Answer:
The correct answer is - the democratic theory.
Explanation:
The democratic theory is a theory that explains that various aspects of democracy such as the importance of democracy, how it is formed, and who rule and what they do.
This theory is the concept that is more often assumed as elections are something that determines who is going to govern and what policies will be enacted into law. It is not correct completely as in democracy people elect their representatives who will question and demand the government for the development of the society and enacting the laws on collective decisions.
Answer:
Explanation:
Once the Fourth Amendment applies to a particular search or seizure, the next question is under what circumstances a warrant is required to be issued. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the U.S. Constitution expresses a preference for searches, seizures, and arrests conducted pursuant to a lawfully executed warrant.
A warrant is a written order signed by a court authorizing a law-enforcement officer to conduct a search, seizure, or arrest. Searches, seizures, and arrests performed without a valid warrant are deemed presumptively invalid, and any evidence seized without a warrant will be suppressed unless a court finds that the search was reasonable under the circumstances.
Read on to find out about the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement and how it could apply to you.
Requirements for a Valid Search Warrant
An application for a warrant must be supported by a sworn, detailed statement made by a law enforcement officer appearing before a neutral judge or magistrate. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the police officer's knowledge provide a reasonably trustworthy basis for a person of reasonable caution to believe that a criminal offense has been committed or is about to take place (see Carroll v. United States).
Establishing Probable Cause
Probable cause can be established by out-of-court statements made by reliable police informants, even though those statements cannot be tested by the magistrate. However, probable cause will not lie where the only evidence of criminal activity is an officer's affirmation of suspicion or belief (see Aguilar v. Texas). On the other hand, an officer's subjective reason for making an arrest doesn't need to be the same criminal offense for which the facts indicate. (Devenpeck v. Alford).
An Officer's Oath
Probable cause will not lie unless the facts supporting the warrant are sworn by the officer as true to the best of their knowledge. The officer's oath can be written or oral, but the officer must typically swear that no knowing or intentionally false statement has been submitted in support of the warrant and that no statement has been made in reckless disregard of the truth. It's important to note, however, that inaccuracies due to an officer's negligence or innocent omission won't typically jeopardize a warrant's validity.
FIND
Try https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/09/world/teaching-nazi-past-to-german-youth.html
