Answer: Hari is in the best relationship so far and would recover faster than Adams difficult relationship and Neela who just broke off a relationship
Explanation:
An healthy relationship is therapeutic. It goes a long way to heal an individual normally. Having someone who gives you happiness and peace of mind can make you live happier on life than even some material acquisition and the body works with the mind for recovery, having a relationship that is not in a good shape can affect your mood and slow down the healing process. Hari is in the best relationship so far and would recover faster than Adams difficult relationship and Neela who just broke off a relationship
Answer:
The correct option is letter A: Increased reflected sun energy of urban environments relative to that of natural landscapes
Explanation:
Option A is the perfect example of the result of urban heating and not a cause of it. The responsible is the man simply because we create urban environments that are not eco-friendly and this increases the reflected solar energy, therefore increases the heat. So, again, the increase of the heat would be the result.
Answer:
Specific learning disorder is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:Job satisfaction
Explanation:Job satisfaction measures how content or not content people are with their day to day jobs.
This depends on various factors such wages, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, age etc.
These factors can contribute to job satisfaction or dissatisfaction for example Intrinsic motivation, when someone works in a job that aligns well with what drives them in life or a job that aligns with their values they are very likely to be satisfied.
Some people also need things like being rewarded for the work they have done well which may give them satisfaction.
Employers can play the role as much as individuals play the role in job satisfaction by rewarding their employees , increasing their wages .
Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.
