The correct answer is they acquire grammatical rules on their own
Children produce overgeneralization errors as they are still in the early stages of learning errors and imitating their parents. However, as they grow, the develop grammar and syntax on their own
Answer:
I will give you a blunt answer. Because no one felt significant by making a friend.
Explanation:
The truth as to why being in a clique is different than a developmental friendship is due to what we as people desire. we desire a place in life, meaning, and to feel that we are part of something that is bigger than ourselves. We feel small and insignificant, and while making a good solid friend helps, it doesn't give the naturally desired feeling of purpose.
Think of all of the worst groups of people in history. When one thinks a while the best example of the difference between developments friendship and a clique can be found in the NSDAP (Nazi Party). People threw friends into the clutches of the Gestapo in order to feel part of the "clique" that was the Nazi party. These people felt that it was more meaningful to have a common purpose, place, and important role in the future of this clique instead of risking death for a friendship.
Cliques occurr predominately during adolescent stages of life and tend to fade away once young men and women find what they actually value in life. Even then as adults, people get sucked into cliques to feel included and a part of something that makes them feel less alone in this giant place we call the universe.
Answer:
A strong presidency grants unity, stability and protection to representative democracy. To satisfy its people's needs, protecting them from foreign powers and from interior agents, weather this could be only uneffective actions or wrong strategies of government administration.
Explanation:
why? well, first of all when a strong presidency establishes its problem-solving strategies, its ideas, its culture, and its codes. it works under an established pattern of behavore. Then the members of the government including oppositive and supporting parties evaluate the presidency's performance and define what they believe the president is doing fine and what is doing wrong. What they believe is good will most likely satisfy the majority's needs. While what is wrong won't do it. In this scenario, the strong presidency will satisfy some needs and look for their people. But what is judged as bad will be subject to evaluation and argumentation to keep doing it or to change it. Because at the end of the day, democratic governments are decentralized systems that can have a big influence from a different perspective in the execution of government management.
