1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iragen [17]
3 years ago
15

what did the following events compromise of 1850, kansas-nebraka act, and the cred scott decsion have in common?

History
1 answer:
liraira [26]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The common thread putting the three events together is the issue of slavery, the most polemic issue of the pre-war era, the one that ignited the strongest passions in the decades previous to the Civil War. The compromise of 1850 relates to the status of new states admitted after the Mexican-American War; the Dred Scott decision is a Supreme Court sentence; and the Kansas-Nebraska Act is a fiercely disputed piece of legislation.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why is oligarchy important?
dlinn [17]

OligarchyHome  Social Sciences and the Law  Political Science and Government  Political Science: Terms and ConceptsInternational Encyclopedia...International Encyclopedia...The Columbia Encyclopedia,...The Oxford Pocket Dictionary...Further reading<span>TOOLS </span>Oligarchy<span>International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences | </span>1968COPYRIGHT 2008 Thomson Gale.Oligarchy

bibliography

The word “oligarchy” and the concepts which it symbolizes originated in ancient Greece. In its basic use, the word identified one of the general forms of government recognized by the Greeks: that in which political government is conducted by a few persons or families. It was also used more narrowly, by Aristotle for example, to refer to the debased form of aristocracy, that is, to government by the few or by a faction. The term “oligarchy” was also used to refer to the small group of persons who enjoyed a monopoly of political control in oligarchic governments; the term usually had the added sense that the oligarchy ruled in its own rather than in the public interest. For Aristotle, classification of governments rested on two independent variables: the number of persons who ruled and the purposes served by their rule. Oligarchy was present when a few persons ruled for their own satisfaction.

Development of the concept. The original uses of the term were associated with particular social and political regimes and with intellectual modes of analyzing them. Typically, societies were small and traditional and rested on established classes, including a slave class. Within Greek cities citizenship status often identified a large but still minority class that could at least claim to participate in political decisions. Whatever the changes in political forms, this “upper class” was relatively stable by reason of property holding, authority relations with other classes, social position, and so on, and oligarchy could reasonably be expected to be succeeded by other known forms of government. Classical analysts found oligarchies to be endemic among ancient states, but they viewed them as unstable since they rested on military, economic, and leadership factors which were transitory as compared with the continuing forces which supported the relatively large upper classes in traditionalist societies.

In the modern view, these classical conceptions, including oligarchy and the ideas associated with it, are far too simple for effective analysis. Indeed, classical writing makes it clear that the conceptions based on the formal structure of governments were not adequate even then, in spite of the particular emphasis given to form. Greek analysts dealt with the phenomena of power, with the importance of procedures, and, of course, with the paramount role of values. These matters were merged with discussions of political form, but the elements were not clearly discriminated. The subtleties and complexities of Greek political thought do not appear to good advantage in this particular classificatory system.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following ideas from the Baron de Montesquieu influenced the Founding Fathers?
STatiana [176]

Answer:

It's the separation of powers.

7 0
2 years ago
The first time that representatives from all the thirteen colonies met together was at the
kondor19780726 [428]
First Continental Congress, I believe
5 0
2 years ago
Why did the new nation need to pay off its debts
Zanzabum

Answer:

Credit

Explanation:

Hamilton believed that the establishment of national debt and the paying off would increase the credit line of the new Nation which would, in turn, allow the new nation to build and expand.

4 0
2 years ago
The Alamo has become a great symbol, not only for Texans, but for people all over the world. In your own words, what do you thin
lukranit [14]

Answer:

The alamo is a symbol of Americans fighting for there freedom, americans dying for us.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Polands solidarity was
    11·2 answers
  • What caused a tide of refugees to escape east berlin?
    14·1 answer
  • The benefits of education, training, and choosing careers for workers
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Constantinople considered Constantine I’s greatest achievement?
    10·1 answer
  • Who believed additional protections in the constitution would further secure the rights and liberties of citizens?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name of the group that elects the President of the U.S.?
    15·2 answers
  • Marking brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • In which colony would a religious dissenter suffer the most persecution? A. Massachusetts Bay C. Pennsylvania C. Rhode Island D.
    6·1 answer
  • How did Corazon Aquino describe democracy before her presidency?
    7·1 answer
  • What do you think of henry’s plan? how would you characterize henry based on his idea and it’s execution?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!