Answer: a warrantless search or seizure
Explanation: A probable cause to seize or search property exists when facts and circumstances known to an officer would have lead to a reasonable person to believe that the item is contraband ( banned substance, items ), stolen, or constitutes evidence of a crime. When a search warrant is issued, only items described on the warrant can be searched for.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
That is a good question...
Explanation:
holy...
