Explanation:
Media and t.v stars are the role model of the public. The public has faith and belief in Movie and TV stars. When people watch violence on tv and videos, it affects them personally because their ideal star is performing that act. But this relation does not show that watching violence is related to aggressive behavior. OTV, video, and media play a role model for the public.
If the public watch violence on tv or media they get influenced more than directly watching aggression. This it is not necessary that watching violence influences the aggressive behavior of people because of media.
Hello there
the answer is
It seems to me that those cultures which have an oral rather than a written tradition have rather sophisticated ways of memorising certain things. Many of them are strongly attached to land which is the basis of not only their livelihood, but also their spiritual beliefs.
Basically, from my limited understanding, the land then acts as a “map” for many things, from the surrounding geography through to a “map” of their spiritual beliefs. As land has lots of identifying markers, this then acts as an aid to remembering most details of the lives of people from such cultural traditions.
It's a ridiculous subject and we have more important things to keep on our plate then fairness. Life is not fair, just live and let live.
Answer:
B. it is often transitory—that is, it is brief and passing.
Explanation:
There are lots of different kinds of collective behavior, so trying to identify a specific set of standards or reasons to suit all is very difficult. Also, episodes of collective behavior —such as riots, social panic, and more— are unpredictable and last for a short time, which represents a difficulty for sociologists who want to analyze them as they take place. People involved in these events are often strangers to each other, making it even harder to determine who took part in them.