Asian countries like China and Japan play a huge role in determining the rulers of the nation and get actively involved in the decision-making process.
<h3>What is decision-making?</h3>
The process of taking important decisions in the matters related thereto is the process of decision-making. Sometimes, the entire population is involved in this process.
The countries like Japan and China are constitutional and thus, as are able to actively engaged in the taking important decisions of the nations, also in determining the rulers.
Hence, option A holds true regarding the decision-making and determination of rulers in the Asian countries.
Learn more about decision-making here:
brainly.com/question/13244895
#SPJ1
Answer:
Here are the main points for an informative speech about the history of the @ symbol.
I. The first recorded use of the @ symbol was in 1536 to represent units of wine.
II. In later centuries, the @ symbol was used to mean "at the rate of" or "at the cost of."
III. Today’s @ symbol came into use in 1971 in the first e-mail ever sent.
These main points are arranged in <em><u>chronological</u></em> order.
Explanation:
Chronology is one of the auxiliary sciences of history. Its purpose is to determine the temporal order of historical events. Events happen in a place and at a specific time. Space and time are two coordinates that allow us to understand reality. A chronological order is an order established based on a temporal sequence. The expression is often used to account for real historical events or fictional narratives where events are presented in a virtual temporal order.
It is important to distinguish the <em>chronological order</em> from a <em>temporal succession</em>. Both are closely linked but differ in fundamental circumstances. Indeed, temporal succession is the order that events have over time. In a different way, the chronological order usually refers to the way in which real events are enunciated. Indeed, the chronological order is a type of circumstance related to discourse, and therefore, to communication.
<span>The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda
was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation.
He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had
unconstitutionally obtained his confession.
Hope this helps.
</span>
