<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>
Answer: check explanation.
Explanation:
Computer Forensics involves the techniques used in gathering evidence from a particular computing device. The evidence gathered from computer Forensics should be suitable for presentation in a law court.
Computer Forensic investigator need to consider some properties such as the corrosive elements, static electricity, temperature and the magnetic field when packaging and transporting evidence.
Computer Forensic investigators follow set of procedures for their analysis;
(1). physical isolation of the device in question so as to make sure it cannot be contaminated accidentally, and (2). digital copy of the device's storage media should be made and locked in a secure facility.
Majority of religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
<h3>What is a
democracy system?</h3>
It is a government system where the laws, policies, leadership of the state are directly or indirectly decided by the people,
Hence, the religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
Read more about democracy system
<em>brainly.com/question/3710021</em>
#SPJ1
Answer: Strict liability
Explanation:
Strict liability basically responsible for holding the someone liable for the damages and loss without any mistake. Basically , it is the legal concept which the person are responsible for their consequences and action.
It is also known as absolute liability that basically caused by the damages and the defective products. The strict liability are basically reorganize as criminal law and possession crime is one of the example of the strict liability.
A consultant was alleged to be in material breach of a consultancy contract for refusing to supply his services. He responded to a material breach notice by stating that he was willing to perform. However, the Court of Appeal held that this was insufficient to remedy the breach (Bains v Arunvill Capital Limited).(According to the court, actual performance, rather than an indication of a willingness to perform, is required to remedy a material breach of contract.
