What type of evidence would support the rebuttal? Check all that apply. Rebuttal: It is true that Bob Dylan has published tradit
ional poetry and prose. However, one book of poetry and one memoir would not qualify him for the prize. The prize was awarded based on his songwriting, which does not qualify as literature. Statistics about the number of books written by past recipients of the Nobel Prize in Literature a review that an acclaimed literary professional wrote about Bob Dylan's book of poetry a quotation by a literary scholar explaining why Dylan's lyrics are not poetry quotations from both Tarantula and Chronicles: Volume One a quotation from a Nobel judge explaining that the prize was awarded because of Dylan's lyrics
Answer: There are two types of evidence that can be used to support the rebuttal: Statistics about the number of books written by past recipients of the Nobel Prize in Literature and a quotation by a literary scholar explaining why Dylan's lyrics are not poetry.
Explanation: As the rebuttal consists in questioning the prize awarded to Dylan due to the lyrics of his songs, the best way of supporting this rebuttal would be providing information about the number of books that previous Nobel prize winners actually published<u> in order to contrast this number with the number of books that Dylan wrote, which were very few</u>. Statistics would also function <u>to prove that this prize has always been awarded to authors for their books and not for their lyrics</u>. Furthermore, a quotation by a literary scholar explaining why Dylan's lyrics are not poetry would also be very useful <u>in order to establish a distinction between poetry and music, two types of art that involve different processes.</u>
I think it's A. It is definally not the climax as this happens when Beowulf kills the monster. It's not the resolution either as it is the first part of the text. Also, exposition seems a little unrelated.
