they had to change everything up because the cause was to spread change
after and before there where innovations that could not be changed without war
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
In the Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood, Odysseus was portrayed as a hero and this was how it was portrayed differently than in Odyssey. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it helps you.<span />
Answer:
ethnic and territorial disputes,
the lingering influence of the Communist party,
constitutions that are difficult to uphold
Explanation: just took the test
It could be argued that during the "Cold War", the <span>Communists expelled the Nationalists from the mainland, since Nationalist ideology was often against the main tenants of communism. </span>
