It is most likely A.
Criminal cases (such as murders, felonies, etc.) have to have evidence from the state (camera recordings (probably from a store or a street camera), autopsies (probably), etc.).
Think of Law and Order cases.
Civil cases (ex. a person suing another person) have to have evidence from their own possession (ex. if a person is suing another for ruining their fence, they must bring evidence that the sued person actually did it, such as a camera recording they took from their phone). Think of Judge Judy cases.
Although I'm not 100% sure, it is very likely that the answer is A.
I believe the answer is: <span>the paradox of close relationships
</span><span>the paradox of close relationships cause a certain people to be overly dependent on other people's that they consider as 'close' in handling various situations in their live. One negative aspect of this paradox is that it might make people held their close friends accountable even for the mistake that they personally made.</span>
Answer:
A. Stated in broad terms to allow for flexibility
Explanation:
During the briefing, incident objectives will be presented to all the person involved as the main goal of the operation.
Flexibility<em><u> is allowed in finding methods /ways to achieve</u></em> the goals , BUT <u><em>flexibility cannot be allowed in determining the goal itself. \</em></u>
<em> </em>Stating the objectives in broad terms to allow flexibility only create the risk of confusion, which make team members have different ideas of what needed to be achieved.
To ensure that all the team members work harmoniously, objectives need to be Logically attainable, can be measured by a specific standard, include time frame that specify when the objectives needed to be done, and it also need to stay within the commander's jurisdiction.
