Read the conversation. CHAIRMAN REED. I’d like to call this meeting to order. Mr. Hollembeak, your willingness to meet with us t
oday speaks to your openness and integrity in this investigation. I am looking forward to an honest and candid discussion. Members of the committee, please remember that we will reconvene in a closed session at 2 p.m. today to take a vote. Please hold your comments and questions until each statement has been read. Mrs. Louis, please begin. MRS. LOUIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I begin by referring to my colleague’s November 22nd testimony that the files being discussed were not properly encrypted and that their security may have been compromised. Were you aware of this at the time? MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I was not aware. Based on the findings of an internal review board that I established after my appointment in 2016, I concluded that my department’s security protocol was up to date. MRS. LOUIS. I understand that you released a report of your findings on February 15th of last year. Am I correct? MR. HOLLEMBEAK. You are correct. CHAIRMAN REED. Do you have a copy of this report with you, Mr. Hollembeak? MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I do. I have it here. CHAIRMAN REED. Submitted for the record, Mr. Hollembeak’s security report, dated February 15, 2016. How is Mr. Hollembeak demonstrating appropriate behavior for participating in this discussion? Select three options. He has come prepared for the discussion. He is following protocol for the discussion. He is offering to support his point of view with further details. He is withholding his questions until the end of the discussion. He is using casual, accessible language that is appropriate for the discussion.
He is offering to support his point of view with further details.
Explanation:
According to the conversation, after Chairman Reed reminds people of the rules of the discussion, Mr Hollembeak's testimony and position as regards the security of certain files are acknowledged. Thus, he follows the right behavior in such situation, since he is predisposed and qualified to discuss the quality of protection of the files involved. Actually, he has a copy of a report he wrote about the subject, so he can support his viewpoint with facts.
It's asking you how your reading selection has effected you. did they make you better writer? did you become more perceptive to detail? stuff like that. basically how reading effects you
