RemarkIf you don't start exactly the right way, you can get into all kinds of trouble. This is just one of those cases. I think the best way to start is to divide both terms by x^(1/2)
Step OneDivide both terms in the numerator by x^(1/2)
y= 6x^(1/2) + 3x^(5/2 - 1/2)
y =6x^(1/2) + 3x^(4/2)
y = 6x^(1/2) + 3x^2 Now differentiate that. It should be much easier.
Step TwoDifferentiate the y in the last step.
y' = 6(1/2) x^(- 1/2) + 3*2 x^(2 - 1)
y' = 3x^(-1/2) + 6x I wonder if there's anything else you can do to this. If there is, I don't see it.
I suppose this is possible.
y' = 3/x^(1/2) + 6x
y' =

Frankly I like the first answer better, but you have a choice of both.
The perfect whole squares are 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100.
Less than 30 are:
<h2>1, 4, 9, 16, 25</h2>
Answer: 3/16 is not equivalent to 3/8
Step-by-step explanation: 3/16 would be like eating 3 pieces of a pie that has 16 pieces whilst 3/8 would be like eating 3 pieces of a pie that has 8 pieces. They are mildly similar but 3/16 is twice as small as 3/8 and henceforth not equivalent.
Answer:
(1, 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given coordinates of 2 endpoints, G(-2, 5) and H(4, 1), midpoint of AB is calculated as shown below:
Midpoint (M) of GH, for G(-2, 5) and H(4, 1) is given as:

Let 

Thus:



Coordinates of the midpoint of GH = (1, 3).