Answer:
It is neutral because it does not obviously affect the dog’s survival.
Explanation:
How would this definitively affect their rate of survival? I know it is a rhetorical question, but unless dogs rely only upon their tails for communication within the species (or something of the sort), I don't see the help or harm in it.
Answer with Explanation:
Before Luther's Reformation, he thought that a person's sins could deny him of his salvation when he dies. It was also a proof that he wasn't faithful or loyal enough to the Lord.
However, such conviction of his changed after witnessing some events. He questioned the Pope's ability to set the Christians free from suffering. With this, he realized that<em> sin was not a moral failure.</em> People have been born in order to die and for him, this is the meaning of "sin." In order not to lose in the battle of death, one must be <u>"baptized."</u> This is the option given by God to humans.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Explanation:
On August 23, 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union sign a non-aggression pact, stunning the world, given their diametrically opposed ideologies. But the dictators were, despite appearances, both playing to their own political needs.
After Nazi Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia, Britain had to decide to what extent it would intervene should Hitler continue German expansion. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, at first indifferent to Hitler’s capture of the Sudetenland, the German-speaking area of Czechoslovakia, suddenly snapped to life when Poland became threatened. He made it plain that Britain would be obliged to come to the aid of Poland in the event of German invasion. But he wanted, and needed, an ally. The only power large enough to stop Hitler, and with a vested interest in doing so, was the Soviet Union. But Stalin was cool to Britain after its effort to create a political alliance with Britain and France against Germany had been rebuffed a year earlier. Plus, Poland’s leaders were less than thrilled with the prospect of Russia becoming its guardian; to them, it was simply occupation by another monstrous regime.
Answer:
because many ppl thought they shouldn't have gotten into their business and it was very difficult
The Hamburg Massacre (or Hamburg Riot) was a key event in South Carolina during July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances, many of which Democrats planned in the majority-black/Republican Edgefield District, to disrupt Republican meetings and suppress black voting through actual and threatened violence.[1]
<span>Beginning with a dispute nominally over free passage on a public road, this incident was based on racial and political grounds. A court hearing attracted armed white militia numbering more than one hundred, including members of Red Shirts paramilitary groups.</span>
