Answer:
If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.
The British are said to be reserved in manners, dress, and speech. They are famous for their politeness, self-discipline, and especially for their sense of humor.
British people have a strong sense of humor which sometimes can be hard for foreigners to understand. Britain is a country of mixed cultures.
Etiquette is the set of traditional policies of personal behaviour in polite society, usually within the shape of an ethical code that delineates the predicted and widely wide-spread social behaviours that accord with the conventions and norms found by using a society, a social elegance, or a social organization. In modern-day English usage, the French phrase étiquette (French: [etikɛt]; lit. 'label, tag, memo, and so on.') dates from the yr 1750. inside the third millennium BCE, the ancient Egyptian vizier Ptahhotep wrote The Maxims of Ptahhotep (2375–2350 BC), a didactic e book of precepts extolling civil virtues, along with truthfulness, self-discipline, and kindness toward other humans.
LEarn more about manners here
brainly.com/question/1741474
#SPJ4
Still the basic economic superiority of the camel prevailed. A few wagons reappeared under the Turks. More significantly, the Ottoman Turkish expansion into the Balkans did not spell the end of wheeled transport there. However, in general the use of the camel remained all-pervasive until the advent of European influence which stimulated the building of carriages for use in cities.
Then came the automobile and the end of the contest was in sight. There were setbacks, of course. In World War II, for example, lack of tires often forced the Arabian American Oil Company (Aramco) to use camels instead of trucks. But that was temporary. Today even Bedouins keep a truck parked outside their tents. The day of the camel is past, and whoever laments its passing would do well to remember that 2,000 years ago someone else was lamenting the passing of the ox cart.
YES, IT DID
Answer:
the right of the people to vote over slavery
Explanation:
The questions above is related to the "Kansas-Nebraska Act." It was a bill passed in <em>1854</em> that<u> allowed the people in a territory to determine whether they will allow slavery or not in the new state's borders. </u>This was called<em> "popular sovereignty."</em>
This bill was meant to organize the western territories. Although it passed the Congress, it wasn't able to achieve its purpose. <em>This led to more factions </em>because many people from the <u>North opposed slaver</u>y while many people from the <u>South supported slavery</u>.
So, this explains the answer.
