Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.
Answer:
Explanation:
Boarding schools basically ripped kids away from their parents and forced them to attend boarding schools which were supposed to help them become more "civilized" and assimilate with the rest of the euro-american society. The schools taught skills that were way below the standards, and thus these kids could not function well in the society. These kids were also ripped from their homes so they did not fit well with their own society as they had little to no knowledge of their own culture. These schools were also full of sexual abuse, physical abuse, trauma, emotional abuse, and even scientific testing.
Thus, in short, these schools had extremely negative impact on native children as well as on native parents. These parents witnessed their kids getting ripped from them but could not do anything to stop it, thus suffered from emotional suffering from separation.
Answer:
Edward A. Carter Jr. was a career non-commissioned officer for the United States Army and one of the few African American recipients of the Medal of Honor during World War II.
Answer:
Marat was a French journalist who suffered from a deteriorating skin disease that obliged him to spend most of his time inside a bathtub. However, this did not stop him from being one of the most respected voices among the radical groups of the revolution.
He made such claims because he was, along with Robespierre, the most noteworthy radical figure of the Revolution. Marat actively called for the murder of the King and the royal family, and the murder of all of the nobles and political prisoners who supported the king and the Ancient Regime.
In the end, he was successful because the royal family was beheaded, as well as many political prisoners. However, he was himself killed by a loyalist peasant, who stabbed him to death while he was on his bathtub.
