Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
Subway hires inexperienced people just apply online and you should be called within a few days to start training immediately
Question:
If an utility company were considering an increase in electricity or gas prices in order to cover the costs of a capital investment, this sector would result in the smallest change in quantity demanded in the long run and thus higher profits. True or false?
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
Change in the demand for gasoline and or electricity is primarily set by the number of industrial or bulk users.
Scarce goods are allocated though the help of prices. It is important to note that demand for gasoline or electricity is <u>more elastic in the long term</u>, so small changes in price will alter supply and demand in either direction in the shortrun.
The demand for gas or electricity are by nature <em><u>inelastic.</u></em> This means that when prices go up, demand goes down <em><u>but not by much.</u></em>
It means that in the short term, the individuals cannot alter their lifestyle immediately to adjust for the hike in prices.
To adjust they would have to probably purchase new devices which or cars which consume less gas or electricity.
The effect this has for the company on the overall is that they are able to achieve their aim of recouping their capital investments from the planned increase in price.
Cheers!
Answer:
$7,840
Explanation:
The inventory of Items A and B should be valued at the lower of cost and the net realizable value.
The cost is the invoice price at time of purchase ,while the net realizable value is the selling price less to sell
Products Cost Selling price cost to sell NRV unit value
A $18 $22 $6 $16 $16
B $48 $54 $4 $50 $48
Item A is valued at $16 each i.e $16*160=$2,560
Item B is valued at $48 each i.e $48*110=$5,280
total value of inventory =$7,840
The ending inventory valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value is worth $7,840
Answer:
<u>Transactions:</u>
1. June 1 Monthly invests $3, 910 cash in exchange for shares of common stock in a small welding business.
2. June 2 Purchases equipment on account for 340.
3. June 3 $760 cash is paid to landlord for June rent.
4. June 12 Bills P. Leonard $410 after completing welding work done on account.
<u>Journal Entries:</u>
1.
June 1 Dr. Cr.
Investment $3,910
Cash $3,910
2.
June 2 Dr. Cr.
Equipment $340
Account Payable $340
3.
June 3 Dr. Cr.
Rent Expense $3,760
Cash $3,760
4.
June 12 Dr. Cr.
P. Leonard (Receivable) $410
Welding Service Revenue $410
