1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
3 years ago
15

The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban “separate but equal” law schools in Texas

History
2 answers:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
4 0

In the 1950, Supreme Court decided to <u>ban</u> “separate but equal” doctrine of law schools in Texas, because:

Answer: 'forced graduate schools across the country to integrate.'

The Supreme Court decided that racial divisions where unconstitutional between white and black students in public schools across the country. This decision was motivated by a case involving a black man, Mr. Sweatt, who had his admission denied by the School of Law of the University of Texas.


uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:  forced graduate schools across the country to integrate.

The 1950 Supreme Court decision in Sweatt v. Painter was specifically about one case regard to access to the law school at the University of Texas, but as a Supreme Court decision it had application to graduate schools elsewhere also.  It also was a case that was a building block to a future case that would apply the same principle across all of education in the United States.


Details:

The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).

Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into  the School of Law of the University of Texas.  Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time.  So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.

In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have  lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students.  The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.

In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education.  The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.  In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.  After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.

You might be interested in
Explain the political geographic and cultural impact of the treaty of guadalupe-hidalgo.
Tasya [4]

Answer:

The answer has been explained below.

Explanation:

Treaty of Guadlupe-Hidalgo was signed on February 2, 1848.It ended the American War that had begun in May 1846  over the territorial disputes that included Texas. It added 525,000 miles of territory to US that includes land of present -day California, C, Nevada, New Mexico , Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. Mexico also recognised Rio Grande as America's southern boundary

US Senate consented the ratification of the treaty by a vote of 38-14, only the Whigs dissented.  Whigs had also opposed the manifest destiny and the Mexican- American war.

8 0
3 years ago
Who was the last scholar of the roman world to have an in-depth knowledge of greek philosophy?
Georgia [21]
Boethius
Hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
How were the governments in the Southern colonies different from the governments in the Middle and New England colonies?
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

they just built different

Explanation:

they built different

5 0
2 years ago
What is a good organizing topic for the post–Civil War era?
Shtirlitz [24]

Southern reconstruction is a good organizing topic for the post–Civil War era.

<u>Explanation:</u>

During the civil war, there was a lot of destruction of the infrastructure and a huge loss of life ad property especially in the south. This destruction needed to be built again and the infrastructure needed to be built.

This led to the beginning of the southern reconstruction after the civil war. The aim of this was to develop the infrastructure of the southern part of the country to develop the economy. It lasted from 1865 to 1877.

3 0
3 years ago
The Middle Colonies were called "Bread Colonies" for the wheat grown there.<br><br> True or False??
enyata [817]
I think it i true hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is the united states still a democratic republic reddit?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of a political party's national convention?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the weakness of the free market?
    15·1 answer
  • Que es el ecosistema
    7·1 answer
  • Question 13 of 14
    14·1 answer
  • Carolingian power over the Franks was solidified by Charles Martel's defeat of which group in 732, at Poitiers?
    6·1 answer
  • There are few religious figures in Islamic art because Muslims believed that _______?
    7·2 answers
  • Why is this man an important historical figure?
    9·1 answer
  • 17. Which of the following was NOT a problem that the Republic of Texas faced?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following nations was NEVER part of the Triple Entente/Allies?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!