Answer: the second to last one
Explanation: Absolute monarchs have absolute power and are basically dictators while constitutional monarchs are voted in and their power is restricted
Answer:
I think 11, because none of the others make sense. Though the point of 11 is that you cannot sue a state that you don't live in. So I am not positive.
A decline<span> in land productivity would easily have led to famine. The other explanation is that the people of Great </span>Zimbabwe<span> had to move in order to maximise their exploitation of the gold trade network. By 1500 the site of Great </span>Zimbabwe<span> was abandoned.</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. election of judges as a way to check the power of the other branches." Thomas Jefferson would have supported <span>election of judges as a way to check the power of the other branches.</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The Roman senate was comprised of the patricians, who were extremely powerful and affluent scions in Roman Society who ruled during the Republic. They were disinterested in helping the normal Roman citizen and instead helping themselves. Julius Caesar was a populist who wanted the normal citizens to have their voices heard and seized control of the Senate.
