A similar point between these colonies is how both were based on agriculture that served both food and commerce.
<h3>What were the differences?</h3>
- The colonials of New England focused on the export of wood.
- For this, these colonies had a very efficient transport system.
- The Chesapeake clones focused on tobacco production and export and on perennial crops that provided pasta for food.
Both colonies occupied and expelled indigenous villages, where they had to attack and suffer attacks from the natives due to the occupation of land. This changed the way of life of the natives and forced the creation of relationships between them and the settlers. Among these relationships, the Chesapeake colonies were more friendly, although they had to face some problems.
Learn more about the New England and Chesapeake colonies:
brainly.com/question/28337862
#SPJ1
<em>Answer:Slaves sold in the slave market at Montgomery, Alabama, likely to have come largely from Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. Until the Thirteenth Amendment that came into the united colonies of America in 1865 slavery was a legal phenomenon.</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
Answer:
Food and personal care stocks often called “defensive stocks,” usually do well. There are times when bonds go up as stocks decline. Sometimes a particular sector of the market, such as utilities, real estate, or health care, might do well, even if other sectors are losing value
hope this helped
Explanation:
Answer: The Heiji War was a civil war between the Taira and Minamoto clans.
Explanation:
Geography affects every aspect of history as it is responsible for determining the winners of wars, the prosperity of people and the formation of cultures. To quote the Bradley Commission on History in Schools, "...geography is by nature the constant companion of historical studies; it is hardly possible to grasp the one without the other." Because the events of history take place on the stage of the world, they are inevitably influenced and even determined by geography.
Rivers are an easy example of how geography can impact history. Most of the earliest human civilizations developed along large rivers because of the nutrients that were deposited in the surrounding soil during annual floods. Without the specific geography of India, Mesopotamia, China and Egypt, ancient farmers would have quickly used all the nutrients in the soil in these places, and that would have meant that the farmers would have had to keep moving to grow crops. That would have meant that they never would have settled down long enough to develop the advanced tools and societal structures associated with civilization. With rivers, however, these early people had an easy way of transporting goods and a natural defense against invaders in addition to a vital source of food.
The influence doesn't end there, however. Rivers allowed the Vikings to raid far into inland Europe, and the Mississippi River made it far easier for Europeans to explore North America. Moreover, other geographic features, such as mountains and plains, have had an equally strong impact on history, like when 300 Spartans used the mountain pass at Thermopylae to hold off thousands of Persian soldiers
Pls give me a brainliest if this helped thx
