Answer:
They believed that if the federal government had control of the army and the militia it would be very dangerous, because the government would have a strong centralization of power.
Explanation:
For anti-federalists, allowing the government to have centralized control of the militia would give a lot of power to the head of federal control, that is, it would give a lot of power to the president. This could promote a strong abuse of power, as the country's armed forces would be controlled by a single person, who would be too powerful to be prevented from acting as he wished.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Choose the propaganda style that best fits the statement below. "My opponent, Governor Thomason has raised taxes, increased spending and lied to you, the American people."
plain folks
name calling
card stacking
bandwagon
Answer:
The propaganda style that best fits the statement is:
B. name calling.
Explanation:
We can easily reach the conclusion above via elimination. Let's take a look at each of the options:
A. plain folks: a style of propaganda that attempts to depict a certain person as "one of the people" or "average Joe". It's commonly used by politicians to show us they are ordinary people just like us. This option is INCORRECT.
<u>B. name calling: a style that consists of saying bad things about one's opponent in order to make people see him from a negative perspective. Often involves attributing pejorative nicknames or adjectives to the other. This is precisely what we have here, since the speaker is calling his opponent a liar. This option is CORRECT.</u>
C. card stacking: a style which manipulates information in order to make something or someone look better. This option is INCORRECT.
D. bandwagon: a technique that relies on the idea of "jumping on board" or "everyone else is doing this, and so should you." This is clearly not the case here. This option is INCORRECT.
