Answer:
<h2>
C.The social construction of race </h2>
Explanation:
Race is a social construct, it is not biological. There are no genes common to all whites and blacks so race cannot be genetically verified and it were true then the classification of people based on race would have been constant across boundaries, but it is not so because a person who is categorised as black in US might be considered white in Latin american countries.
The Greeks, Poles, Italian and Hungarian migrants were not considered to be whites in 1800s and 1900s, they tried to overcome it by showing through behaviour that they were worthy of being called white. The people form Netherlands,Ireland,Scandinavian countries and Germany were considered to be white.
The Americans were afraid that the foreigners would bring peculiar religious practices and substandard ways of living and religious practises to this country , that would bring down this civilisation.
Political parties : people tend to choose the candidate from the party they're rooting for
peers/social background = People tend to choose those who are chosen by their peers
Election/personal beliefs = people tend to choose someone that has the same belief as them
TV/Radio = Can control people opinion through various news
internet = A medium where people can freely express their opinion and could influence others
hope this helps
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
Answer:
The Camps were a difficult place to live because the Japanese Americans who lived there had to endure bad food, inadequate medical care, and poorly equipped schools.
People who lived in the camps had to share bathroom and laundry facilities, and hot water was usually limited. The camps were surrounded by barbed wire and guards who were supposed to shoot those who tried to escape.
To summarize, the camps were not overly harsh or terrible, but it was unfair to force Japanese Americans to live in them when they had done nothing wrong, and when the living conditions at the camp were inadequate.
Please give me brainliest if I helped!
Answer:
"Availability Heuristic"
Explanation:
According to my research on Judgment Making it can be concluded that Alex's Wife mirrors the "Availability Heuristic" in this scenario. This is because the Availability Heuristic is a mental shortcut where a person uses the immediate examples that come to mind when defending a belief or argument. Since Alex's wife is trying to convince Alex from boarding the plain by using plane crash examples we can assume this is what his wife is mirroring in this scenario.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
